Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 25, 2023
Published
December 29, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 12 Download : 7

Main Article Content

Abstract

Positive or negative perceptions of disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus can affect the patient's ability to manage their disease and perceive the disease as something that can be managed or something that is threatening. Treatment satisfaction influences decisions related to the patient's health and is related to treatment behavior that has an impact on treatment outcomes. This study aims to determine the relationship between perception of disease and satisfaction therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at RSU Undata Palu. This research is a non-experimental research with a cross-sectional method approach by collecting data on independent and dependent variables at one time or simultaneously. The instruments used in this study were the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) and the Diabetes Medication Satisfaction Tool (DMSAT). The results showed that most of the respondents had a negative perception of disease 51.25% and 62.5% were very satisfied. The results of the chi-square correlation test obtained a p-value of 0.193 (p> 0.05). This shows that there is no significant relationship between perception of disease and satisfaction with therapy for patients with diabetes mellitus at Undata General Hospital, Palu.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. American Diabetes Association. (2021). Scholarly Journals. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1989
  2. Amisim, A., Kusen, A. W. S., and Mamosey, W. E. (2020). Persepsi Sakit Dan Sistem Pengobatan Tradisional Dan Modern Pada Orang Amungme (Studi Kasus Di Kecamatan Alama Kabupaten Mimika). Jurnal Holistik, 13(1), 1–18. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/holistik/article/view/29521
  3. Bangga, R. dwi. (2016). Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen B-IPQ (Brief Illness Oerception Questionnare) Versi Indonesia Pada Pasien Diabetes Melitus Di RSUD Sultan Syarif Mohamad Alkadrie Kota Pontianak. Naskah Publikasi, 1–8. http://statistikapendidikan.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Uji-Validitas-dan-Reliabilitas.Gilang-AM1.pdf
  4. Chew, B. H., Vos, R. C., Heijmans, M., Shariff-Ghazali, S., Fernandez, A., and Rutten, G. E. H. M. (2017). Validity and reliability of a Malay version of the brief illness perception questionnaire for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0394-5.
  5. Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah. (2021). Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah. Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah, 1–377.
  6. Istianah, I., Septiani, S., and Dewi, G. K. (2020). Mengindetifikasi Faktor Gizi pada Pasien Diabetes Mellitus Tipe 2 di Kota Depok Tahun 2019. Jurnal Kesehatan Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Health), X(2), 72-78.
  7. Nurhaliza, S. (2022). Instrumen Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire ( DQLCTQ ) Untuk Mengukur Tingkat Kualitas Hidup Pasien Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2. Journal Syifa Sciences and Clinical Research., 4(2), 396–407.
  8. Persatuan Endokrin Indonesia. (2019). Pedoman Pengelolaan dan Pencegahan DM Tipe 2 Dewasa Indonesia. Perkumpulan Endokrin Indonesia. 113. 38.
  9. Persatuan Endokrin Indonesia (2021). Pedoman pengelolaan dan pencegahan Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 Dewasa di Indonesia. Perkumpulan Endokrin Indonesia. 119.
  10. Rasdiana, N., Martodihardjo, S., Andayani, M., and Hakim, L. (2018). Jurnal Delima Harapan 2018 Jurnal Delima Harapan 2018. 6(2), 59–68.
  11. Tampa’i, R., Sumombo, J., Hariyadi, H., Lengkey, Y. (2021). Gambaran Drug Related Problems (DRPs) pada Pasien Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 di Puskesmas Tuminting. Jurnal Kefarmasian Indonesia, 11(1), 49–55.
  12. Widiasari, K. R., Wijaya, I. M. K., and Suputra, P. A. (2021). Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2: Faktor Risiko, Diagnosis, Dan Tatalaksana. Ganesha Medicine, 1(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.23887/gm.v1i2.40006