Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 6, 2022
Published
June 29, 2022
Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 406 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract

The development of quality human resources is essentially aimed at improving intellectual abilities, so that higher productivity can be achieved. HR and innovation should be viewed as closely related concepts, which together create a reinforcing cycle of value creation. Since HR is one of the main sources of innovation, the innovation strategy needs to include various relevant initiatives to stimulate HR. This is an important key as a new force in achieving economic prosperity in the era of competition in science and technology. Strategic planning is needed in order to adjust internal strengths so that they are always ready to seize opportunities and overcome external threats if you want to maintain a competitive advantage. So this article aims to identify the relevant gaps in human resources related to innovation performance, in order to create a more effective innovation strategy. The proposed approach, linking HR with an innovation strategy using gaps in HR for a more comprehensive assessment of innovation performance, enables countries/regions/cities/ organizations to create adequate innovation strategies/policies in the knowledge age.

Keywords: Human Capital; innovation; effective strategies.

Abstrak

Pengembangan sumber daya manusia yang berkualitas pada hakekatnya ditujukan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan intelektual, sehingga dapat dicapai produktivitas yang lebih tinggi. SDM dan inovasi harus dipandang sebagai konsep yang terkait erat, yang bersama-sama menciptakan memperkuat lingkaran penciptaan nilai. Karena SDM adalah salah satu sumber utama inovasi, strategi inovasi perlu mencakup berbagai inisiatif yang relevan untuk merangsang SDM. Hal ini menjadi kunci penting sebagai kekuatan baru dalam mencapai kesejahteraan ekonomi di era persaingan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi. Perencanaan strategis diperlukan dalam rangka menyesuaikan kekuatan internal agar selalu siap menangkap peluang dan mengatasi ancaman dari luar jika ingin mempertahankan keunggulan bersaing. Maka artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi kesenjangan yang relevan dalam sumber daya manusia terkait dengan kinerja inovasi, untuk menciptakan strategi inovasi yang lebih efektif. Pendekatan yang diusulkan, yang menghubungkan SDM dengan strategi inovasi yang menggunakan celah di SDM untuk penilaian kinerja inovasi yang lebih komprehensif, memungkinkan negara/wilayah/kota/ organisasi untuk menciptakan strategi/kebijakan inovasi yang memadai di era pengetahuan.

Article Details

References

  1. Adrian Klammer, Stefan Gueldenberg, Sascha Kraus.( 2017). Michele O’Dwyer3 To change or not to change–antecedents and outcomes of strategic renewal in SMEs
  2. Avlonitis, G. J. and H. E. Salavou (2007). "Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness, and performance." Journal of Business Research 60(5): 566-575.
  3. Bontis, N. (1998), “Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and modelsâ€,Management Decision, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 63-76.
  4. Bontis, N. (2002), “Managing organisational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the fieldâ€, in Choo, C.W. and Bontis, N. (Eds), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organisational Knowledge, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 621-642.
  5. Bontis, N. and Fitz-enz, J. (2002), “Intellectual capital ROI: a causal map of human capital antecedents and consequentsâ€, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 223-247.
  6. Bontis, N., Crossan, M.M. and Hulland, J. (2000), “Managing an organisational learning system by aligning stocks and flowsâ€, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 437-469.
  7. Bontis, N., Janosˇevic´, S. and Dzˇenopoljac, V. (2013), “Intellectual capital and the corporate performance of Serbian banksâ€, Actual Problems of Economics/Aktual’ni Problem Ekonomı `ki, Vol. 142 No. 4, pp. 287-299.
  8. Bontis, N., Keow, W.C.C. and Richardson, S. (2000), “Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industriesâ€, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 85-100
  9. Cabrilo, S. and Grubic-Nesic, L. (2010), “A Strategic model for intellectual capital reporting: study of service industry in Serbiaâ€, in Serrano Fernandes Rodrigues, S.C. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Intellectual Capital in Lisbon, Portugal, Academic Publishing Limited, Reading, pp. 161-171.
  10. Cabrilo, S. and Grubic-Nesic, L. (2012a), “IC-based innovation gap assessment: a support tool for the creation of effective innovation strategies in the knowledge eraâ€, in Surakka, J. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Intellectual Capital, Arcada University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Academic Publishing International Limited, Reading, pp. 96-106.
  11. Cabrilo, S. and Grubic-Nesic, L. (2012b), “The role of creativity, innovation and invention in knowledge managementâ€, in Buckley, S.B. and Jakovljevic, M. Eds), Knowledge Management Innovations for Interdisciplinary Education: organizational Applications, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp. 207-233.
  12. Cabrilo, S., Uzelac, Z. and Cosic, I. (2009), “Researching indicators of organizational intellectual capital in Serbiaâ€, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol.10 No. 4, pp. 573-587.
  13. Cater, T. and Cater, B. (2009), “(In)tangible resources as antecedents of a company’s competitive advantage and performanceâ€, Journal for East European Management Studies, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 186-209.
  14. Donaldson, L. (2001), The Contingency Theory of Organizations, Sage, London.
  15. Dyogo Felype Neis, Maurício Fernandes Pereira, merson Antonio Maccari. (2016) Strategic Planning Process and Organizational Structure: impacts, confluence and similarities. Brazilian Bussinese review. Vitória-ES, 2016
  16. p. 1-19 ISSN 1808-2386
  17. James J. Chrisman, Jess H. Chua, Alfredo De Massis, Tommaso Minola, Silvio Vismara (2016) Management processes and strategy execution in family
  18. firms: from ‘‘what’’ to ‘‘how’’ Small Bus Econ 47:719–734
  19. DOI 10.1007/s11187-016-9772-3
  20. Sladjana Cabrilo, Sremska Kamenica, and Leposava Grubic Nesic and Slavica Mitrovic. (2014). Study on human capital gaps for effective innovation strategies in the knowledge era. Emeraldinsight Study on human
  21. capital gaps
  22. Godin, B. (2008). "Innovation:The History of a Category." Research Paper: 67.
  23. Shu-Hsien Liao, Chih-Chiang Chen, Da-Chian Hu, Yu-chun Chung, Min-Ju Yang (2016). Developing a sustainable competitive advantage:absorptive capacity, knowledge transfer and organizational learning. Springer Science+Business Media New York.
  24. Tovstiga, G. and Tulugurova, E. (2009), “Intellectual capital practices: a four-region comparative studyâ€, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 70-80.