Main Article Content
Abstract
Currently, many purchases of goods can be found electronically or known as e-wallets. E-wallet is a form of Fintech (Finance Technology) that utilizes internet media and is used as an alternative payment method. Several other types of e-wallets: Dana, Shopeepay, Gopay, Ovo, Sakuku. This study discusses the best recommendations among types of E-wallet using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Both of these methods are able to make more accurate assessments and predetermined preference weights. Based on calculations using the SAW and TOPSIS methods, the first best e-wallet ranking is DANA, the second is Shopeepay, and the third is Gopay.
Keywords
Article Details
References
- Ashraf, M., Zaman, M., & Ahmed, M. (2020). An Intelligent Prediction System for Educational Data Mining Based on Ensemble and Filtering approaches. Procedia Computer Science, 167(2019), 1471–1483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.358
- Christioko, B. V., Indriyawati, H., & Hidayati, N. (2017). Fuzzy Multi-Atribute Decision Making (Fuzzy Madm) Dengan Metode Saw Untuk Pemilihan Mahasiswa Berprestasi. Jurnal Transformatika, 14(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.26623/transformatika.v14i2.441
- Fishburn, P. C. (1967). Additive utilities with incomplete product sets: Application to priorities and assignments. Operations Research, 15(3), 537–542.
- Hwang, C.-L., & Masud, A. S. M. (2012). Multiple objective decision making—methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey (Vol. 164). Springer Science & Business Media.
- MacCrimmon, K. R. (1968). Decisionmaking among multiple-attribute alternatives: a survey and consolidated approach. Rand Corp Santa Monica Ca.
- Mutmainah, I., & Yunita, Y. (2021). Penerapan Metode Topsis Dalam Pemilihan Jasa Ekspedisi. Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi Dan Komputer), 10(1), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v10i1.1028
- Santiary, P. A. W., Ciptayani, P. I., Saptarini, N. G. A. P. H., & Swardika, I. K. (2018). Jurnal Pengertian Topsis. 5(5), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik2018551120
- Supriyatna, A., & Ekaputra, D. (2017). Metode Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting ( Saw ) Dalam Pemilihan Ketua Osis. Jurnal PETIR, 10(1), 71–76.
- Yeh, C. (2002). A problemâ€based selection of multiâ€attribute decisionâ€making methods. International Transactions in Operational Research, 9(2), 169–181.
References
Ashraf, M., Zaman, M., & Ahmed, M. (2020). An Intelligent Prediction System for Educational Data Mining Based on Ensemble and Filtering approaches. Procedia Computer Science, 167(2019), 1471–1483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.358
Christioko, B. V., Indriyawati, H., & Hidayati, N. (2017). Fuzzy Multi-Atribute Decision Making (Fuzzy Madm) Dengan Metode Saw Untuk Pemilihan Mahasiswa Berprestasi. Jurnal Transformatika, 14(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.26623/transformatika.v14i2.441
Fishburn, P. C. (1967). Additive utilities with incomplete product sets: Application to priorities and assignments. Operations Research, 15(3), 537–542.
Hwang, C.-L., & Masud, A. S. M. (2012). Multiple objective decision making—methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey (Vol. 164). Springer Science & Business Media.
MacCrimmon, K. R. (1968). Decisionmaking among multiple-attribute alternatives: a survey and consolidated approach. Rand Corp Santa Monica Ca.
Mutmainah, I., & Yunita, Y. (2021). Penerapan Metode Topsis Dalam Pemilihan Jasa Ekspedisi. Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi Dan Komputer), 10(1), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v10i1.1028
Santiary, P. A. W., Ciptayani, P. I., Saptarini, N. G. A. P. H., & Swardika, I. K. (2018). Jurnal Pengertian Topsis. 5(5), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik2018551120
Supriyatna, A., & Ekaputra, D. (2017). Metode Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting ( Saw ) Dalam Pemilihan Ketua Osis. Jurnal PETIR, 10(1), 71–76.
Yeh, C. (2002). A problemâ€based selection of multiâ€attribute decisionâ€making methods. International Transactions in Operational Research, 9(2), 169–181.